The barcode scanner chirps, the late-night snack is logged, and a little red number appears that feels less like information and more like judgment. For millions of people, that tiny alert is the nudge that keeps them honest. For others, it is the moment motivation starts to fray.
New research, familiar feelings
A team led by researchers at University College London and Loughborough University examined how that fray forms. In work published in the British Journal of Health Psychology, the group analyzed nearly 60,000 posts on the social platform X that discussed five popular apps used for diet and exercise: MyFitnessPal, Strava, WW, Workouts by Muscle Booster, and Fitness Coach & Diet. About 13,000 posts contained negative language tracked by the researchers, and more than half of those referenced the calorie-counting mainstay MyFitnessPal.
The sample captures unprompted reactions in the wild, rather than responses to a survey. That rawness is part of the point. Senior author Dr. Paulina Bondaronek of UCL said the posts often reflected emotional fallout when digital goals and real life collide.
“In these posts, we found a lot of blame and shame, with people feeling they were not doing as well as they should be. These emotional effects may end up harming people’s motivation and their health,” Dr. Bondaronek said.
What surfaced again and again was a pattern familiar to anyone who has ever tried to corral daily habits with a screen. The tools are meant to help people monitor behavior, set targets, and get feedback. Yet when feedback is relentless, targets drift from challenging to unrealistic, or progress is framed as public performance, the same tools can seed guilt, anxiety, and a temptation to quit altogether.
When a helpful nudge becomes a drag
Behavior-change science has long found that self-monitoring helps, particularly when goals are specific and attainable and when feedback affirms effort rather than amplifies failure. Many fitness apps do a version of this well. They count the steps you did take, not the steps you did not. They celebrate streaks and badges. They automate the boring parts, like scanning a barcode or importing a recipe, to make good intentions easier to execute.
But convenience cuts both ways. If the numbers are off, or the goals are generated without context, the feedback loop can skew. Some posts described calorie targets that would be unsafe or simply impossible. Others focused on the way streaks and leaderboards made workouts feel less like a private routine and more like a public scoreboard. If a long run was not recorded, did it even count. If you break a streak on day 29, is day 30 worth starting.
That is the emotional trap the researchers saw. It is not that data is bad. It is that data, stripped of context, can crowd out the quieter signals that sustain behavior over time. Rest days are not failure. Plateaus are not proof that effort is wasted. A single celebratory meal is not a spiral. Apps project tidy lines and steady arcs. Life rarely follows them.
A dataset with power and blind spots
Scraping public posts offers a candid window into how people talk when no researcher is looking over their shoulder. It also comes with limitations. The study focused on negative language, which means it highlights what goes wrong rather than estimating how often apps help overall. People who are most inclined to post are a particular slice of users, and those who are having a rough time may be overrepresented. Bots and spam exist. None of that makes the frustration any less real, but it does shape what conclusions we can draw.
There are other gaps. Public posts reveal very little about outcomes that matter most. The data does not show whether someone actually exercised less, regained weight, or deleted the app. It cannot separate a fleeting rant from a sustained drop in motivation. And because the posts come from users who opted into both the apps and the platform, they do not capture people who never considered self-tracking in the first place.
Even with those caveats, the themes align with long-standing concerns in digital health. Extrinsic rewards can crowd out intrinsic motivation. Constant feedback can fuel all-or-nothing thinking. Social comparison can spur effort for some and self-criticism for others. The take-away is not to abandon technology, but to get more careful about the incentives it creates and the emotions it evokes.
Design choices that change outcomes
If the problem is not information but interpretation, better design can help. The study points developers toward specific hazards and, by extension, toward practical fixes that do not sacrifice engagement.
- Set guardrails on goals. Calorie targets and training plans should default to evidence-based ranges and flag values that are unsafe or physiologically unrealistic.
- Focus on process, not perfection. Highlight streaks in a way that tolerates breaks, such as flexible streaks that allow rest days without a total reset.
- Make social features optional and kinder. Allow users to hide leaderboards, mute competitive cues, and emphasize supportive community messages over comparisons.
- Contextualize lapses. When someone under-logs or skips a workout, provide prompts that normalize setbacks and point to the next doable step rather than scolding.
- Celebrate small wins. Reinforce consistency, technique, sleep, and recovery, not only speed, volume, or weight change.
- Build private modes. Not every milestone needs an audience. A clearly labeled private setting can reduce pressure and preserve the joy of training for its own sake.
None of these ideas are radical. They are small shifts in tone and defaults that aim to keep people in the game. The same interface that nudges someone to hit a daily target can also remind them that bodies ebb and flow, and that consistency over months beats intensity over days.
What users can do right now
Most people will not wait for an app update to decide whether to keep logging. There are simple ways to reclaim control without ditching digital tools entirely.
- Adjust the noise. Turn off nonessential notifications so the app reports to you, not the other way around.
- Pick fewer numbers. Track one or two metrics that matter most to your goals and mental bandwidth.
- Set your own thresholds. Use app targets as suggestions and recalibrate if they clash with common sense or professional guidance.
- Keep some workouts off the grid. If public sharing fuels comparison, switch to private or skip the post. The workout still counts.
- Watch your self-talk. If a log leaves you feeling judged, treat that as data too and consider changing the settings, the tool, or the plan.
